[Bug 969209] Review Request: nx-libs - NX X11 protocol compression libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969209

--- Comment #3 from Mario Ceresa <mrceresa@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Okay, I point out some potential issues:

* mock fails to install the package:

Error: Package: x2goagent-3.5.0.20-3.fc20.x86_64
(/x2goagent-3.5.0.20-3.fc20.x86_64)
Requires: x2goserver

* rpmlint is not silent:

- Several non standard executable permission (0775L) on libraries. Not sure if
it's intentional
- Several only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
- Several devel-file-in-non-devel-package
- Others: 

nx-libs.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion nx <= 3.5.0.20-3.fc20 obsoletes nx =
3.5.0.20-3.fc20
nx-libs.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion nx(x86-64) <= 3.5.0.20-3.fc20 obsoletes
nx(x86-64) = 3.5.0.20-3.fc20
nx-libs.x86_64: E: no-binary
nx-libs.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/nx-libs-x86_64.conf
nx-libs.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/nx-libs-3.5.0.20/LICENSE
libXcomp.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups /usr/lib64/nx/libXcomp.so.3.5.0
libXcomp.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/libXcomp-3.5.0.20/LICENSE
libXcompext.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/libXcompext-3.5.0.20/LICENSE
libXcompshad.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/libXcompshad-3.5.0.20/LICENSE
nx-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on nx/nx-libs/libnx
nx-fontconfig-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on
nx-fontconfig/nx-fontconfig-libs/libnx-fontconfig
nx-freetype2-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on
nx-freetype2/nx-freetype2-libs/libnx-freetype2
nxagent.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups /usr/lib64/nx/bin/nxagent
x2goagent.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/x2go/bin/x2goagent
../../nx/bin/nxagent

* there are unversioned so-files:
libNX_X11: /usr/lib64/nx/X11/libximcp.so
libNX_X11: /usr/lib64/nx/X11/libxlcDef.so
libNX_X11: /usr/lib64/nx/X11/libxlcUTF8Load.so
libNX_X11: /usr/lib64/nx/X11/libxlibi18n.so
libNX_X11: /usr/lib64/nx/X11/libxlocale.so
libNX_X11: /usr/lib64/nx/X11/libxomGeneric.so

However, they seem private, so maybe it is not an issue

I'll also attach the fedora-review output if you need it as a reference

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x98ydC1uJE&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]