https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967517 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I'll take this, since I requested it... So, question #1, why the Epoch? If you're thinking you need an epoch because you want to obsolete a higher-versioned package, I don't think you do. A new package with a different name can obsolete a higher-versioned old package. The example at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages happens to demonstrate this (it has an un-epoch'ed bar replacing an epoch'ed foo). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UdxSFqhg6T&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review