Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xml-commons-apis12 - JAXP 1.2, DOM 2, SAX 2.0.1, SAX2-ext 1.0 apis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231263 mwringe@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mwringe@xxxxxxxxxx| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mwringe@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-09 17:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Please remove the second BuildRoot. removed > What is epocj in ... > Provides: %{name}-apis-javadoc = %{epocj}:%{apis_version_1_2} > ? oops, spelling mistake, change to epoch > The %setup section includes... > > # remove all binary libs and prebuilt javadocs > rm -rf `find . -name "*.jar" -o -name "*.gz"` > > The sources don't include any .jar or .gz files, so I think this could be removed. removed > Are we adding Red Hat copyright notices to these files (seeing as JPP has them). I don't think I have seen them outside of the jpp packages. > > I think this should be ready to go once these are taken care of / answered. > > Thanks! > > New Files uploaded there: https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/285/xml-commons-apis12.spec https://mwringe.108.redhat.com/files/documents/175/286/xml-commons-apis12-1.2.04-0jpp.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review