https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #14 from Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> --- * fedora-review shows: warning: bogus date in %changelog: Wed May 23 2013 Christopher Meng <rpm@xxxxxxxx> - 2.18.6-1 --> Thu May 23 * in spec: BuildRequires: lfcbase-devel%{?_isa} BuildRequires: lfcxml-devel%{?_isa} --> you must NOT use %{?_isa} in BuildRequires, because these will be the "Requires" of the produced SRPM. SRPM must not have Requires on fixed arch. If you have such in your specs on SCM as well, fix them, rebuild and resubmit to obsolete older release, please. Don't forget to add Requires: lfcbase-devel%{?_isa} to the lfcxml-devel for reason explained/clarified in #12. You can drop the (Build)Requires on lfcbase-devel in spec of this pkg after fixing lfcxml, then. * sed-magic doesn't seem to work on binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath: cego.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cgblow ['/usr/lib64'] cego.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cego ['/usr/lib64'] cego.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cgadm ['/usr/lib64'] cego.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cglog ['/usr/lib64'] cego.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cgclt ['/usr/lib64'] --> Consider using `chrpath` as a last resort: BuildRequires: chrpath after install: for _rpbin in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/* do chrpath --delete "${_rpbin}" done * sed-magic doesn't seem to work on unused-direct-shlib-dependency: cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0 /lib64/librt.so.1 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libnsl.so.1 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libreadline.so.6 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libhistory.so.6 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcego.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0 /lib64/librt.so.1 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libnsl.so.1 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libncurses.so.5 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libtinfo.so.5 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libreadline.so.6 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libhistory.so.6 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0 /lib64/liblfcxml.so.1 cego.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libcgwrap.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 --> There's something _really wrong_ with configure.ac and/or Makefile.am. Are you familiar with autotool's meta-files-syntax or shall I workout a solving patch on them? Let's discuss this on PM. Please fix the above in spec (patch not needed instantly) and I'll give it another shot ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y5kYCslQgs&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review