https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858061 greg.hellings@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greg.hellings@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |greg.hellings@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from greg.hellings@xxxxxxxxx --- $ rpmlint mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend.spec $ rpmlint mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.0.1-1.fc19.src.rpm $ rpmlint results_mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend/5.0.1/1.fc18/mingw32-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.0.1-1.fc18.noarch.rpm results_mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend/5.0.1/1.fc18/mingw64-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.0.1-1.fc18.noarch.rpm $ rpm -q --requires mingw32-qt5-qtjsbackend $ rpm -q --requires mingw64-qt5-qtjsbackend $ rpm -q --provides mingw32-qt5-qtjsbackend $ rpm -q --provides mingw64-qt5-qtjsbackend $ wget --quiet http://releases.qt-project.org/qt5/5.0.1/submodules_tar/qtjsbackend-opensource-src-5.0.1.tar.xz -O - | md5sum af5ccb9d5ab589df03eb0b12fb5ab4cd - $ md5sum qtjsbackend-opensource-src-5.0.1.tar.xzaf5ccb9d5ab589df03eb0b12fb5ab4cd qtjsbackend-opensource-src-5.0.1.tar.xz af5ccb9d5ab589df03eb0b12fb5ab4cd qtjsbackend-opensource-src-5.0.1.tar.xz + OK ! Needs to be looked into / Not applicable [+] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines [+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-' [+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header} [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages [+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch [+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section [+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, %mingw_cmake_kde4 or %mingw_qmake_qt5 to configure the package [+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package [+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package [+] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used [+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated [+] Libtool .la files are not bundled [+] .def files are not bundled [+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal [+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=btdgPMnLYk&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review