https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858077 greg.hellings@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greg.hellings@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |greg.hellings@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from greg.hellings@xxxxxxxxx --- $ rpmlint mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module} mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev} mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module} mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev} mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: qt5-qtsensors-ceec1eda.tar.gz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.0.0-0.5.git20130510.ceec1eda.fc20.src.rpm mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src: E: unknown-key GPG#9b393ae8 mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module} mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev} mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module} mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev} mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src: W: invalid-url Source0: qt5-qtsensors-ceec1eda.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. $ rpmlint results_mingw-qt5-qtsensors/5.0.0/0.5.git20130510.ceec1eda.fc18/mingw*.noarch.rpm mingw32-qt5-qtsensors.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-qt5-qtsensors-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-qt5-qtsensors.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-qt5-qtsensors-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpm -q --requires mingw32-qt5-qtsensors rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw32-crt mingw32-filesystem >= 83 mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll) mingw32(libstdc++-6.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32(qt5core.dll) mingw32(qt5qml.dll) mingw32(qt5sensors.dll) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm -q --requires mingw64-qt5-qtsensors rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw64-crt mingw64-filesystem >= 83 mingw64(kernel32.dll) mingw64(libstdc++-6.dll) mingw64(msvcrt.dll) mingw64(qt5core.dll) mingw64(qt5qml.dll) mingw64(qt5sensors.dll) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm -q --provides mingw32-qt5-qtsensors mingw32-qt5-qtsensors = 5.0.0-0.5.git20130510.ceec1eda.fc18 mingw32(qt5sensors.dll) mingw32(qtsensorgestures_plugin.dll) mingw32(qtsensorgestures_shakeplugin.dll) mingw32(qtsensors_dummy.dll) mingw32(qtsensors_generic.dll) mingw32(declarative_sensors.dll) $ rpm -q --provides mingw64-qt5-qtsensors mingw64-qt5-qtsensors = 5.0.0-0.5.git20130510.ceec1eda.fc18 mingw64(qt5sensors.dll) mingw64(qtsensorgestures_plugin.dll) mingw64(qtsensorgestures_shakeplugin.dll) mingw64(qtsensors_dummy.dll) mingw64(qtsensors_generic.dll) mingw64(declarative_sensors.dll) + OK ! Needs to be looked into / Not applicable [+] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines [+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-' [+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header} [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages [+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch [+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section [+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, %mingw_cmake_kde4 or %mingw_qmake_qt5 to configure the package [+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package [+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package [+] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used [+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated [+] Libtool .la files are not bundled [+] .def files are not bundled [+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal [+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal All of the discrepancies and warnings have been discussed before and are acceptable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1QCSdsxTNi&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review