[Bug 894834] Review Request: mingw-gtkglext - OpenGL Extension to GTK+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894834

--- Comment #15 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > * The autoconf files which are created by this package can be removed
> > (%{mingw32_datadir}/aclocal/* and %{mingw64_datadir}/aclocal/*) as they're
> > duplicate files which are already provided by their native counterpart
> 
> I have a nagging feeling that there must be some case where they are useful.
> 
> I would suspect the mingw aclocal files get included when the 'configure'
> script tries to rebuild itself after the configure.ac timestamp has changed.
> Not all packages do that, it depends on if/how the AM_MAINTAINER_MODE macro
> is used.
> 
> (This case above can be "fixed" by forcing a rebuild of 'configure' with the
> native aclocal files by running autoreconf before %mingw_configure.)

I understand the situation you're trying to explain, but afaik
autoconf/automake is only aware of /usr/share/data/aclocal. There are no
references to /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/data/aclocal in our
mingw macros so how is autofoo ever supposed to be aware of files in these
folders?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H2YEjNQjGI&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]