Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858084 --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #6) > Wrt angleproject, I wish it were that simple. It is actually used in > qtwebkit for all platforms, something to do with webGL support. I read about this in your qt5-qtwebkit review ticket. Did you already try just removing the bundled ANGLE code and see what fails during the build? Perhaps the additional pieces from ANGLE aren't actually used by qt5-qtwebkit > So, if I understand you correctly, angleproject may be possible to be > unbundled if the default static linking is used? I would have to try that out, but theoretically it should be possible. Unfortunately this still doesn't resolve the fact that each fork of ANGLE has its own set of features and internal symbols. Perhaps things have improved in the last couple of months (I haven't done investigations in this area recently) but I'm afraid it will still end up in a messy situation.. This also makes me wonder which a better situation: linking against a static ANGLE library which is bundled with qt5-qtwebkit, or linking against a static ANGLE library which is part of a separate mingw-angleproject-static package. Both aren't really ideal.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dfaANFY2RS&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review