Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961141 --- Comment #21 from Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi, before review , lets fixes things and see you agree ... I change packages names of dpkg in rawhide , because make sense and think it is the fedora way. libdpkg-perl -> dpkg-perl (fedora usually don't start with lib, sometime we may use dpkg-libs or dpkg-perl.libs ) dpkg-devel -> dpkg-dev (devel is a reserved word for headers of dpkg) . and .h .a .so -> dpkg-devel we always could rollback my commits . some answers inline (In reply to comment #20) > Spec URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/debhelper.spec > SRPM URL: > > http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/debhelper-9.20120909-1.fc18.src.rpm > > * Manual pages (In reply to comment #16): > - Found a far better solution: install man-pages via dh_installman > - Luckily, man-pages layout is FHS compliant in both Fedora/Debian > - The debhelper-mans.lang is generated as before (Fedora specific). > > * Dependencies (In reply to comment #19 and comment 18): > - Build-Requires: dpkg-devel > # No need for specific version (both dpkg 1.15.x and 1.16.x are OK) will be Build-Requires: dpkg-dev > > - Requires: libdpkg-perl > # No need to specify version, libdpkg-perl was added only at 1.16.x > # Not a '*-devel' package -- Good. OK will be Build-Requires: dpkg-perl > # Minor problem: rpmlint complains about 'noarch' debhelper that > depends on 'lib*' package. this took two commits dpkg-perl can't be noarch because /usr/lib/dpkg/parsechangelog/debian and /usr/lib64/dpkg/parsechangelog/debian , I'm not sure what this parsechangelog/debian do and if shouldn't be in other place than /usr/lib/dpkg/ > * So what about rpmlint? > - Basically, rpmlint is wrong: the libdpkg-perl contains only pure perl > modules (updated bug #648384 so that dpkg.spec correctly marks > libdpkg-perl is 'noarch') dpkg-perl can't be noarch > > - Either we surrender to rpmlint and rename libdpkg-perl. IMO it's a bad > idea -- better stick to upstream names per Fedora policy. > > - Or we ignore this rpmlint error (maybe file a bug against rpmlint?) > > * ... and we are still blocked by bug #648384 -- dpkg too old we have dpkg-1.6 in rawhide , so I could review this bug properly :) Best regards, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vAP4ob54RY&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review