Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960198 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> --- * rpmlint says: libyui-gtk.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C gtk3 User Interface for libyui * About %_hardened_build I'm still not convinced that a GUI framework classifies as security relevant. Here's an interesting thread: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-August/155382.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-August/thread.html#155358 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#PIE If it will become mandatory, it will likely be added to %configure, for example. * Not related to this package, but the libyui %doc examples, which I've tried for some basic testing. I just discovered they apply the MIT license. Not a big issue, bug the -doc package's "License" tag isn't correct then. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT#Modern_Style_with_sublicense https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario * What's necessary to get "examples/ManyWidgets.cc" to compile? * This package is APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yJRS9NUTXs&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review