Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962423 --- Comment #3 from David Tardon <dtardon@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #2) > [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) > for the package is included in %doc. > > You should include 'COPYING-LGPL' file as %doc. Oops, missed that one. > > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > ltmain.sh is shipped with a GPLv2+ license. I know that the libtool script > itself should not be included with package, since it is in the source > archive, > maybe License field should be changed to "(MPLv2.0 or LGPLv2+) and BSD and > GPLv2+". > > [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must > be documented in the spec. > > GPLv2+ license should be documented. The License field applies to the content of the binary package, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License:_field . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qh6p5zLjvN&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review