[Bug 920879] Review Request: tali - GNOME tali game

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920879

Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|Reopened                    |
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #11 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Fedora review tali-3.8.0-1.fc19.src.rpm 2013-05-11

+ OK
! needs attention

+ Rpmlint is very noisy here, but most of the warnings / errors seem harmless.
  The unreadable /usr/bin/tali is a bit weird, but it's the same as in
  the old gnome-games and I suppose it didn't have the r bit for a reason.
+ The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the base package name.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
  Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The package contains the license file (COPYING)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum:
  e9f1389df409247074aa24b329888482  tali-3.8.0.tar.xz
  e9f1389df409247074aa24b329888482  Download/tali-3.8.0.tar.xz
+ The package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
+ The spec file handles locales properly
n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all the directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages should not contain libtool .la files
+ Proper .desktop file handling
+ Doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8

APPROVED

Wohooo, and that was the last one of the 15 new split up gnome-games modules!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=L1waSiZpX7&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]