[Bug 959734] Review Request: sigrok-firmware - Firmware for some hardware supported by sigrok

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959734

--- Comment #4 from T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx> ---
While the nexus-osciprime firmware falls under the binary firmware exception so
it's okay to use the prebuilt binary, in order to be complaint with the GPLv2
you still need to ship the source code to it in the SRPM.  You should also set
the license tag to GPLv2(+).

Does upstream plan to add more firmware to this package in the future?  It
seems silly to use -nonfree and -free subpackages when each only contains one
kind of firmware.  It seems to make more sense just to name the package after
the type of firmware included.

Rpmlint
-------
Checking: sigrok-firmware-free-0.1.0-1.20130426git83e0802.fc20.noarch.rpm
          sigrok-firmware-filesystem-0.1.0-1.20130426git83e0802.fc20.noarch.rpm
          sigrok-firmware-0.1.0-1.20130426git83e0802.fc20.src.rpm
          sigrok-firmware-nonfree-0.1.0-1.20130426git83e0802.fc20.noarch.rpm
sigrok-firmware-free.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C The
sigrok-firmware-free package contains firmwares which are available under free

Please wrap at 80 characters.

sigrok-firmware-free.noarch: W: invalid-license Redistributable

Please use an appropriate license tag for the GPL here.

sigrok-firmware-filesystem.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C sigrok-firmware
directory structure

Something like "Directory structure for the Sigrok firmware" would shut this
up.

sigrok-firmware-filesystem.noarch: W: invalid-license Redistributable

Please use a valid license specifier (since this just contains a single
directory something like Public Domain would probably be most accurate).

sigrok-firmware.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libsigrok 

False positive, library name,

sigrok-firmware.src: E: description-line-too-long C sigrok-firmware only
contains firmware files which have an explicit permission/license

Please wrap at 80 characters.

sigrok-firmware.src: W: invalid-license Redistributable

Please use the union of the licenses for the SRPM, just to make things clear.

e.g. GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted

sigrok-firmware.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
sigrok-firmware.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
sigrok-firmware.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
sigrok-firmware.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
sigrok-firmware.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %{checkout}

Please escape macros used in comments.  (e.g. "%%{name}")

sigrok-firmware.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
sigrok-firmware-0.1.0-20130426git83e0802.tar.gz

OK, instructions for generating in the comments.

sigrok-firmware-nonfree.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C The
sigrok-firmware-nonfree package contains firmwares available under non-free
licenses

Again, please wrap at 80 characters.

4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 11 warnings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iBzMMakUST&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]