[Bug 910233] Review Request: geoip-geolite - Free IP geolocation databases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910233

Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |puiterwijk@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@xxxxxxxxx> ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License CC-BY-SA
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
NO, See below - Sources match upstream sha256sum:
2e7cf43c098c3d8f15d9e764bac51228aa29eceb64ae6f482175884c24e68d7a
GeoLiteCityv6.dat.gz
ab9c4deee7b3ef8bd665db67f2ba312b61d3aeb0233e8b2277f8cfbb9d7f2e6e
GeoLiteCityv6.dat.gz

OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
NO, See below - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
NO, See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described. 
OK - Should have dist tag 
NO, See below - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin

Issues: 
1. The checksum mismatch is because this package has been updated again since
the last submit, which is my mistake. You do not have to re-do it for the
review.
2. It does own %{_datadir}/GeoIP/, but as indicated in the spec file, this is
an exception from the default rules.
3. RPMlint output:
Checking: geoip-geolite-2013.04-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
geoip-geolite.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) geolocation ->
echolocation, collocation, allocation
geoip-geolite.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geolocation ->
echolocation, collocation, allocation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

I couldn't care less about the spelling mistakes ;).


Please make sure to update this package regularly, because it might be
important when people start depending on it.
This package is

APPROVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=O3aHqBIFsM&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]