Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957573 --- Comment #5 from Gregor Tätzner <gregor@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #4) > the package.xml is renamed to {pear_name}.xml > %{name}.xml is used when is a pear channel package. Even the template > provided with rpmdev-newspec -t php-pear php-pear-foo uses pear_name macro the template from rpmdev is just a recommendation. Our guidelines are mandatory. At the end of the day 'sdk.xml' is just too short. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PEAR_Modules > Source0 Leads to unexpected results? may I draw your attention on the double source tag: 'Source0: Source0: ...' :) > -Description FIXED thanks > How do you get??? (rpmlint and install don't complain) " > php-aws-sdk.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/pear/AWSSDKforPHP/_compatibility_test/sdk_compatibility_test_cli. > php 0644L /usr/bin/env > php-aws-sdk.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/pear/AWSSDKforPHP/_samples/cli-s3_progress_bar.php 0644L > /usr/bin/env " just a regular rpmlint run on f18. those script should be executable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=n67vxRECH8&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review