Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945 --- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > - I believe the standard now is to *not* separately download and include a > > license file. But upstream (http://code.google.com/p/java-xmlbuilder/) > > should be asked to include one. > > The thing is if we want to include ASL 2.0 code in Fedora it *has* to have > license included as per point 4.1 of the license[1]. > > [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution open this bug http://code.google.com/p/java-xmlbuilder/issues/detail?id=13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TmrTQf3dbG&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review