Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956127 --- Comment #6 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #5) > You need to bump the release for each change (even during review). No :) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Multiple_Changelog_Entries_per_Release > I've got some questions about this: Trying to answer, but bear in mind I'm on thin ice here. This is my first font package. Furthermore, it's about a web font which doesn't seem to have good guidelines in place(?) > What is the difference between the stuff in the @font-face directory and > that in the Desktop typeface directory? Just assuming from the name: the desktop stuff is more like a regular font, targeted to be used by local applications. The @font-face stuff should then be what the web application send to a client requesting a font after parsing a css3 @font-face tag. > - Why not ship all of the fonts? Basically because I'm lazy, I'm packaging this as a dependency for openerp7 which is a web application. Also, since this is a web-centric symbol font, I don't really see much value of it in e. g. a word processor (might be wrong, for sure). > - Is the .svg file needed? A @font-face tag typically lists several alternative formats for a font, svg sometimes being one of them. I see no reason to limit what the web server can offer in this respect. > - What is the .woff file and is it needed? woff format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WOFF Needed: see above. > - Do you need both the .ttf and the .otf files? Here are not otf files I can see(?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bsUr54lP8k&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review