Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955088 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #4) > You have added a skeleton config file. But what's the advantage of having an > empty global config file? src/settings.c and src/vfs/vfs-file-task.c says (seems to be saying) that spacefm sometimes (when run with privilege mode) writes /etc/spacefm/spacefm.conf, so at least /etc/spacefm should be owned and creating skeleton spacefm.conf is preferable to show that rpm "tracks" this file. Note that it seems that when run as privilege mode spacefm may create /etc/spacefm/%s-as-root (%s is substituted with each user), however %s may change in various ways and I don't think (and I cannot find good way) to own this type of files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Xr4tEHsjlW&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review