[Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: perl


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@xxxxxx  2007-03-05 13:40 EST -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-February/msg00025.html
> 
> I proposed it and no one else on the Packaging Committee was on board with
> permitting perl to be an exception case.

I read the replies to the above message pretty much exactly the opposite - I
don't see anyone being explicitly against it.  rdieter and tibbs were explicitly
on board, and myself, f13 and thimm more or less without an opinion formed at
that point (FWIW, I still haven't, but the clock is ticking).

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-February/msg00027.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-February/msg00029.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-February/msg00038.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-February/msg00039.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-February/msg00047.html

There were also a few non-FPC member comments to the suggestion, slightly
leaning towards being leaving things as is.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]