Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953101 --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #1) > a general comment about many of the subpackages here... I personally would > drop many of the subpackages as I can't imagine many users wanting only > parts of razorqt. Having the main metapackage helps though. Could you > describe the justifications and/or use-case for the fine-grained splitting? > (I have an idea what you may say, but it will be nice to document it here > for posterity anyway). (In reply to comment #2) > 1. End-user will just install "razorqt" meta-package. All-inclusive. > 2. But you can tune package set for your machine. E.g. - minimal razorqt set > - http://qtdesktop.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/spins/F17_QDE-min-0.5.ks I agree. Most of the razor-qt parts are usable standalone. We shouldn't force users to install the whole razor-qt stuff if they just want to use one of the modules in a different environment. They might want to use the app launcher to replace the ugly one in Fluxbox, for example. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DXgA5nuuYU&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review