Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927477 --- Comment #4 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Any reason to not buildrequires doxygen and generate doc, > > maybe a better option than making README.md %doc? > > I thought the documentation appeared more useful to a remake developer than > to an end user, but there is no harm in including it. I will make that I understand. The main page is actually small and gives a good looking formatted output of the same contents of README.md, but the full doxygen comes with a lot of extra stuff only useful for remake developers. > change. You should install README.md in the main package, and the doxygen output in a -doc subpackage. I suggest something like: cp -a doxydoc/html %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} in %install to avoid yet another %_docdir directory. Otherwise, now there is 88K binary and 2.1M doc in the main package. If you prefer changing back to not generating any doxygen documentation I am fine with it. I leave it for you to choose. > > Is there any prevision of an official release? I see only > > "\section sec-licensing Licensing" in remake.cpp with version > > information. Is this correct? > > Yes, and you can also see them by navigating to the project home page and > pressing the "Tags" button, or looking directly at this URL: > > https://github.com/silene/remake/tags Ok. Good enough :-) > Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/remake/remake.spec > SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/remake/remake-0.4-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=P5Vx56Fg1I&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review