[Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jokosher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029





------- Additional Comments From snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx  2007-03-04 19:29 EST -------
(In reply to comment #58)
> Where are the srpms? I downloaded
>    http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher-0.9-1.20070225svn.src.rpm
> and was able to build it in mock development on x86_64.  But the spec file
> doesn't have all the fixes reported in previous comments so I'm unsure if I'm
> building the latest version (that was based off an older revision by mistake) or
> if i'm building something totally foreign.

The fixes in previous comments have either been applied upstream or are no
longer relevant. I'm not sure exactly what you're asking. The build now runs
from the setup.py file. The srpms are at the URI you indicated. I am building
pre-release packages from svn in readiness for 0.9 final which is due in a few
weeks.

Good to know it is building okay for you in x86_64. I'm still concerned about
David's issue however - any thoughts? What needs to happen now to get this accepted?

Regards
Chris

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]