Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-04 19:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #58) > Where are the srpms? I downloaded > http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher-0.9-1.20070225svn.src.rpm > and was able to build it in mock development on x86_64. But the spec file > doesn't have all the fixes reported in previous comments so I'm unsure if I'm > building the latest version (that was based off an older revision by mistake) or > if i'm building something totally foreign. The fixes in previous comments have either been applied upstream or are no longer relevant. I'm not sure exactly what you're asking. The build now runs from the setup.py file. The srpms are at the URI you indicated. I am building pre-release packages from svn in readiness for 0.9 final which is due in a few weeks. Good to know it is building okay for you in x86_64. I'm still concerned about David's issue however - any thoughts? What needs to happen now to get this accepted? Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review