Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951360 --- Comment #11 from T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #9) > Now the question is...why is original package not following the same naming > rules as almost every other nodejs package? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Node.js#Naming_Guidelines > Application packages that mainly provide tools (as opposed to libraries) that happen to be written for Node.js must follow the general naming guidelines instead. Lots of people just use /usr/bin/uglifyjs, so I didn't prefix it. Splitting the CLI and the library didn't seem to make much sense, since they'd still both depend on node. (In reply to comment #0) > It is developed on NodeJS, but it should work on any JavaScript platform > supporting the CommonJS > module system. Note that we carry a pure-JS version (e.g. doesn't require a CommonJS interpreter; Ruby uses it) in the uglify-js-common package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=evXtQVSpf9&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review