[Bug 915005] Review Request: qt5-qttools - Qt5 - QtTool components

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915005

--- Comment #14 from Gregor Tätzner <gregor@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> We don't *have* to, but .desktop files would be nice for anything one would
> want to appear in menus.

no, it wouldn't be nice - it's necessary...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files

Since we don't present qdbusviewer to the user in qt4 packaging, we can get
away with that. But for assistant, a menu entry really has to be provided (for
designer and linguist too). Even if there is not much to see yet ;)

Now if I think about it, the package splitting feels *very* strange. What are
doing all those tools in devel? Imho all binaries should be moved to qttools
since the target group are devs anyway. Or even better: move every tool into
his own subpkg. But again no MUST, so your choice.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2AkjFySHsV&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]