[Bug 822329] Review Request: libzen - Shared library for libmediainfo and medianfo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329

--- Comment #15 from Nikita Klimov <nk@xxxxxxx> ---
Unfortunately, there are a number of comments:

- In License: section replace 'zlib/libpng License' to 'zlib/libpng'

- dos2unix     *.txt Source/Doc/*.html -> dos2unix     *.txt
Source/Doc/Documentation.html (wildcard in my opinion not need)

- Please don't ignore any remark:
"Macro forms of system executables SHOULD NOT be used except when there is a
need to allow the location of those executables to be configurable. For
example, rm should be used in preference to %{__rm}, but %{__python} is
acceptable. "
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros

For example:
%__chmod -> chmod

If you disagree with any remark, explain your point of view, but don't ignore
it.

- Doxygen's tags 'DETAILS_AT_TOP' and 'HTML_ALIGN_MEMBERS' has become obsolete,
please contact upstream. Temporary you can use:

doxygen -u

before generate documentation.

- Do more informative comments in %{changelog} section. For example 'Clean
spec' and 'Spec prepared for review' not informative.
"This is important not only to have an idea about the history of a package, but
also to enable users, fellow packages, and QA people to easily spot the changes
that you make."
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs

- Please add short informative comments to %{prep}, %{build} and %{install}
section before any 'nonstandart' tasks, that explains why this task necessary.

- I know that you are also maintainer in RFRemix project, but in this stage it
doesn't matter. We have to prepare the package for inclusion in Fedora, not
RFRemix. And so the package must comply with Fedora rules. Please remove
RFRemix tags in %{changelog} section. 

- Do you read this
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Convincing_someone_to_sponsor_you
? Please try to doing informal reviews to other packagers in order to find and
convincing a willing sponsor. I can help fix errors and omissions in package,
but can't be a sponsor, and so can't do formal review, because review and
approval for the first package for new packagers must be done by registered
sponsors.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6RoSwWxRGi&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]