Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345 --- Comment #13 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> --- > It's a new parallel-installable upstream stable standalone release. I agree, it makes a lot of sense to make it parallel installable. Whether it's called mozjs17, or js17, or js and the old js-1.8.5 gets renamed to something else, anything works. Just as long as the two versions are parallel installable during the transitional period. No comments on the -devel list so I assume everyone is fine with the new naming. Two more issues: 1) I've just noticed that /usr/bin/js17 is still 3.9M, even after linking with external readline. Would it make sense to split it to another subpackage, or do we need it in the default install for some reason? Does GNOME Shell need it? 'repoquery -q --whatrequires /usr/bin/js /bin/js' returns nothing, so it doesn't seem like anything uses it as an interpreter for script files, at least. Maybe something like: %files %{_bindir}/js17 %files libs %doc LICENSE README %{_libdir}/*.so %files devel %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc %{_includedir}/js-17.0/ 2) It's missing the dist macro: Release: 1%{?dist} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=10yjcWddsR&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review