[Bug 226199] Merge Review: nhpf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: nhpf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226199





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@xxxxxx  2007-03-03 07:27 EST -------
Built without $RPM_OPT_FLAGS.  One way to fix it is 'make
CFLAG="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"' instead of 'make' in %build (note CFLAG, not CFLAGS).

URL points to a "this page has moved" page, and where it's moved to doesn't look
too useful.  Any better one available?

"Distributable" as a license is frowned upon, but I'm not sure what else to put
there in this case.  nhpf.c does contain the license text, it looks pretty much
like BSD but isn't quite the same.  Perhaps it's close enough to use "BSDish"
instead of "Distributable".  Anyway, it'd be nice to have the license text
available in the binary packages.

I'm not able to log into the Source0 FTP server to verify sources nor do I
actually have much clue at all what this package is about so I'll leave rest of
the review to someone else.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]