Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> --- > > Does it really need ncurses/readline headers? I couldn't find any > > ncurses/readline includes in the js header files, at least. Just to clarify, I wasn't talking about BuildRequires. I was talking about the -devel package's runtime requires on the ncurses/readline headers. The dependency seemed to indicate that the ncurses/readline headers need to be present to use the installed js public headers. I was just objecting to that and saying that the public headers (in the -devel package) don't appear to include anything else besides glibc headers. > Looks like it has an internal copy of editline =/ > > I will work on de-bundling this. Cool! Is the internal editline only used for building the command line "js17" interpreter? >From the spec file: > # Not clear to me we should ship this at all really, > # but the real problem is it is statically linked > # which bloats it significantly. > rm -f %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/js17 I guess statically linking with internal editline can account for some of the bloat. If you want to avoid shipping the js17 executable in any case, then it doesn't really matter for Fedora if the tarball has an internal editline or not. If we remove the binary, we aren't shipping the statically linked internal copy anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8l4Btsxyf9&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review