Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889505 --- Comment #18 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #17) [cut] > > > why have you forked the upstream project? > > Primarily to maintain quick turnaround and minimize friction since Mark's > current work is focused on a 2.0 release. I'll write him and ask if he'd > like to create an official 1.0 maintenance branch with the changes I've made. Basically, this motivation isn't enough IMHO. I suggest that you go back to using the upstream sources. If you still need to fix config.inc you can use sed -i to patch it in place. If there are other changes, add a patch and/or new sources. The current situation will make maintenance hard and I would not let it pass if I was reviewing it. Of course, you should try to talk to upstream about merging the patches. However, the first step is to create those patches, not to create a new tarball. BTW, when building for reviews rawhide is the preferred platform. Use mock, and this is no problem. F17 is to old today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XnN2Lr17Uf&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review