Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947587 Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> --- Fedora review of mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.0.6-1.fc18.src.rpm 2013-04-02 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.0.6-1.fc19.src.rpm \ mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.0.6-1.fc19.noarch.rpm \ mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.0.6-1.fc19.noarch.rpm \ mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-base-debuginfo-1.0.6-1.fc19.noarch.rpm \ mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-base-debuginfo-1.0.6-1.fc19.noarch.rpm mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-base.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-base.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-base.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.0.6/COPYING mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-base.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-base.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.0.6/COPYING mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-base-debuginfo.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug information for package mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-base. mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-base-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-base-debuginfo.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug information for package mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-base. mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-base-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings. + The rpmlint warnings/errors are harmless and can be ignored + The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding native Fedora package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 7123a7f9955bbf1a5a7bb75192c15427 gst-plugins-base-1.0.6.tar.xz 7123a7f9955bbf1a5a7bb75192c15427 Download/gst-plugins-base-1.0.6.tar.xz + The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane + locale handling n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package doesn't bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Not applicable to MinGW packages. n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages must not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Directory ownership sane + Filenames are valid UTF-8 Looks good! APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WnRM1B5szS&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review