Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929425 --- Comment #2 from Eugene A. Pivnev <ti.eugene@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #1) > Some initial comments, > > 1. subpkgs should have > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Not mandatory. Plugins need just API, that is fixed for version. So - juffed can be repackaged independently from plugins anf they will work - if version is same. In theory... I'm not sure :-) - need testing. > 3. what's the purpose of splitting plugins into so many sub-packages? In > short, please provide some justification for splitting these out. (Hint: > makes the experience for end-user worse having to manually manage plugins). > I'd suggest either getting rid of -plugins subpackages altogether, or at > least simplify matters some (maybe keep a single -plugins subpackage for all > of them). * Now all of plugins are in same git as juffed, but it is not mandatory. So - if you will create e.g. juffed-plugin-htmlpreview (not in juffed's git) - you will have juffed[, juffed-plugins] and juffed-plugin-htmlpreview. It is not good, IMHO. * You can install those plugins that you need - and nothing else, keeping juffed simpler and faster. As for me - I'd like to install juffed and -plugin-symbolbrowser (sometimes - -sort, -filemanager; occasionally - -doclist and -favorites). So - juffed-plugins is for lazy/fast installation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wz765cfBNc&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review