Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906765 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> --- Fedora review of mingw-libwebp-0.2.1-2.fc18.src.rpm 2013-03-25 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw-libwebp-0.2.1-1.fc19.src.rpm \ mingw32-libwebp-0.2.1-1.fc19.noarch.rpm \ mingw64-libwebp-0.2.1-1.fc19.noarch.rpm \ mingw32-libwebp-debuginfo-0.2.1-1.fc19.noarch.rpm \ mingw64-libwebp-debuginfo-0.2.1-1.fc19.noarch.rpm mingw-libwebp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US WebP -> Web P, Web, Webb mingw-libwebp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossy -> loss, glossy, flossy mingw-libwebp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes mingw-libwebp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://webp.googlecode.com/files/libwebp-0.2.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found mingw32-libwebp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US WebP -> Web P, Web, Webb mingw32-libwebp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossy -> loss, glossy, flossy mingw32-libwebp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes mingw64-libwebp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US WebP -> Web P, Web, Webb mingw64-libwebp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossy -> loss, glossy, flossy mingw64-libwebp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes mingw32-libwebp-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-libwebp-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 10 warnings. + The rpmlint errors/warnings are harmless and can be ignored + The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding native Fedora package ! No license file, even though it's shipped in the tarball (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: dc9b26f16bd5221414dbab95f13d4453 libwebp-0.2.1.tar.gz dc9b26f16bd5221414dbab95f13d4453 Download/libwebp-0.2.1.tar.gz + The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane n/a locale handling n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Not applicable to MinGW packages. n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages must not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Directory ownership sane + Filenames are valid UTF-8 Add the COPYING file and it should be good to go. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ueV3975rkh&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review