Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871197 --- Comment #7 from Rich Mattes <richmattes@xxxxxxxxx> --- The 4.x versions of catkin don't require catkin-pkg yet, only the groovy versions. Since I'm targeting Fuerte first, I'm trying to stick to the package versions listed in http://ros.org/rosinstalls/fuerte-ros-base.rosinstall This includes catkin 4.5. Once we upgrade to groovy, catkin-pkg will be needed. I named it python-catkin because i thought it was installed by pypi (though I think I was just confused, I was doing all of the other python-ros* utilities at the same time.) I'll rename the package to catkin. I think most of the rpmlint errors are OK (the ones with the .in files). The .in files are templates that catkin uses when it generates build files for other packages, so they never get executed directly. That's why they're in share and don't have an executable perm. The isa stuff is OK since catkin is a noarch package (it doesn't have an isa) Thus far I have been putting all the ROS packages I've gotten reviewed into EPEL6. This won't be an exception, so I added a %clean section. Functionally it should work fine. I used it for the rest of the ROS chain which I will be submitting for review soon. Ticket asking for license file at: https://github.com/ros/catkin/issues/398 So new packages are at:Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/rospackages/catkin/catkin.spec SRPM URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/rospackages/catkin/catkin-0.4.5-5.gitd4f1f24.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=M46dwAlpau&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review