Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909671 --- Comment #4 from Matthieu Saulnier <casper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hello, sorry for the latence (In reply to comment #3) > ==== ISSUES ==== > > [!] (with incorrect FSF address) > Please this upstream, and add link to bug report Reported on libexif devel ML: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1364077038.9112.10.camel%40localhost&forum_name=libexif-devel > [!]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. > Sources refers as 0.3.6, but as this version is not yet > released, this is a pre version > Release: 0.2.%{snapver}%{?dist} Fixed > [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. > Drop Requires: pkgconfig Dropped > [!]: rpmlint > Drop empty AUTHORS file > > $ rpmlint -I unused-direct-shlib-dependency > unused-direct-shlib-dependency: > The binary contains unused direct shared library dependencies. This > may > indicate gratuitously bloated linkage; check that the binary has > been linked > with the intended shared libraries only. I hope it is fixed, see %%changelog > ===== > > According to README you can build with gtk2 OR gtk3. > > I think is will be really better to build both libraries: libexif-gtk.so AND > libexif-gtk3.so (probably with a new subpackage for gtk3-libs) Done New SPEC: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/libexif-gtk.spec New SRPM: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/libexif-gtk-0.4.1-0.1.20130323cvs.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aVJSSwXIOL&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review