Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918532 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> --- Fedora review four-in-a-row-3.7.92-1.fc20.src.rpm 2013-03-23 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint output: $ rpmlint four-in-a-row \ four-in-a-row-debuginfo-3.7.92-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm \ four-in-a-row-3.7.92-1.fc19.src.rpm four-in-a-row.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Four-in-a-row four-in-a-row.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided gnome-games-gnect four-in-a-row.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/four-in-a-row-3.7.92/COPYING four-in-a-row-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/four-in-a-row-3.7.92/src/main.c four-in-a-row-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/four-in-a-row-3.7.92/src/games-stock.h four-in-a-row-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/four-in-a-row-3.7.92/src/games-stock.c four-in-a-row-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/four-in-a-row-3.7.92/src/gfx.c four-in-a-row-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/four-in-a-row-3.7.92/src/games-fullscreen-action.c four-in-a-row-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/four-in-a-row-3.7.92/src/games-fullscreen-action.h four-in-a-row-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/four-in-a-row-3.7.92/src/prefs.c four-in-a-row-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/four-in-a-row-3.7.92/src/theme.c four-in-a-row.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Four-in-a-row 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 3 warnings. + Rpmlint warnings / errors are harmless and can be ignored + The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 7b744b8abf9a8f0a824302a79f3c8b1f four-in-a-row-3.7.92.tar.xz 7b744b8abf9a8f0a824302a79f3c8b1f Download/four-in-a-row-3.7.92.tar.xz + The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane + The spec file handles locales properly n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all the directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files + Proper .desktop file handling + Doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages + Filenames are valid UTF-8 Issues ------ > # Contacted the translator. Should be fixed upstream at some point > Patch1: ug-po.patch Please submit it to bugzilla.gnome.org as well. Also, two really minor nitpicks; feel free to change these before importing, if you think it makes sense: a) might be nice to sort the BRs and the %files list, and b) the --all-name option to the %find_lang macro is unnecessary here; all the docs / translations are installed under the 'four-in-a-row' name. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5c5QRlaTQS&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review