Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892625 Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(lemenkov@xxxxxxxx | |m) --- Comment #11 from Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I found these comments on the autoreconf subject: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-December/msg00230.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-October/msg00866.html and this seems to confirm my guess that it is a Debian/Fedora autotools mismatch issue: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2010-June/007187.html My own feeling is that: a) wearing my upstream developer's hat, I'm not keen on different people re-running autoreconf and then asking for support, because they end up with different permutations of the Makefiles b) but on the other hand, I'm the one who implement autotools for reSIProcate, and I tried to make the configure.ac and **/Makefile.am as conventional as possible (no special hacks) so they should be portable to newer/older autotools Have you seen this issue before? Do you think we should follow the suggestion from that first link, force autoreconf to run before configure? Is there anywhere else where this should be discussed on the mailing list perhaps? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=da0vxoa6oA&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review