Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-01 18:14 EST ------- Kevin Fenzi (kevin@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > 1. Might include the following as %doc files: > AUTHORS NEWS THANKS Done. > On point 2, you might consider litterally having: > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > in the spec. Done. > So, the module wasn't loaded and it didn't autoload it. > I did a manual 'modprobe ecryptfs' and then tried again. > It seems to work, but I don't see anything with df, and looking in > dmesg I get: > > mount.ecryptfs[4322] general protection rip:3226c5e4b9 > rsp:7fffa5c67a80 error:0 > mount.ecryptfs[4568] general protection rip:3226c5e4b9 > rsp:7fff15962c10 error:0 There was a bug in the error path (free bogus pointer). Fixed in the ecryptfs-utils-10 release. Peter Vrabec (pvrabec@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > There are 2 lines before kernel error in messages: > Mar 1 11:33:47 rawhide64 mount.ecryptfs: Your kernel does not > support key module [openssl] > Mar 1 11:33:59 rawhide64 mount.ecryptfs: Mount opts: > [ecryptfs_sig=945f0e28ae2dfba0,ecryptfs_key_bytes=16,ecryptfs_cipher=aes,] The mount helper is overly verbose; fixed in the ecryptfs-utils-10 release. I also changed the key module build in ecryptfs-utils-10 so that it is now possible to disable building the OpenSSL key module; however, that should not affect the RPM. Future releases will likely include many more key modules, and if they are all included in the same RPM, then there could be an extra dependency for each key module (openCryptoki, TrouSerS, etc.), whether the user wants the key module or not. If it would be acceptable to break the key modules into individual RPM's (ecryptfs-keymodule-openssl, ecryptfs-keymodule-tss, ecryptfs-keymodule-ock, etc.), then that would reduce the dependencies for ecryptfs-utils. Updated SPEC is here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils.spec?use_mirror=osdn Updated SRPM is here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils-10-0.src.rpm There are also a number of minor kernel bugfixes that Red Hat may want to pick up as separate patches in its 2.6.20 kernel. Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review