[Bug 910137] Review Request: nodejs-node-stringprep - ICU StringPrep profiles for Node.js

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910137

--- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen <jamielinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Spec URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-buddycloud-http-api/nodejs-node-stringprep.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-buddycloud-http-api/SRPMS/nodejs-node-stringprep-0.1.5-3.fc18.src.rpm


> Node guidelines say that where the compiled module is the main entry
> point it should be called %{nodejs_sitelib}/<module name>/<module_name>.node

Fixed.


> The explicit requires on v8 should not be needed any more.

Removed.


> There is no debuginfo package for some reason.

It's present now.


> The second patch can be offered upstream - although older versions
> of node work without an explicit NODE_MODULE they still accept it 
> as I understand things.

Pull request sent.


> Tests spit out a string of warnings:

Fixed.


> nodejs-node-stringprep.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/node_modules/node-stringprep/build/node_stringprep.node 0775L

Fixed.


> The comment about not be able to make index.node work is not
> relevant as the packaging guidelines say to use module_name.node
> in this case anyway.

Removed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zPyvZxukau&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]