[Bug 907007] Review Request: unittest++.spec - Lightweight unit testing framework for C++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907007

--- Comment #10 from François Cami <fdc@xxxxxxxxx> ---

I've fixed the following:

[!]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

Spec URL: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/unittest++.spec
SRPM URL: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/unittest++-1.4-6.fc18.src.rpm


Regarding the following issue:

[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Upstream builds as static only, and while I added the possibility to build a
shared library, I would rather have upstream maintain the soname field if it
existed.
More importantly, I do not expect any Fedora-shipped program to link to this
library, as it is used for unit testing only, so mandating a soname seems
overkill. Luke, have you got any insight on this?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=k9m5yUO5d2&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]