Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919395 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> --- Koji scratchbuild for F-18: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5094571 REVIEW: Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable +/- rpmlint is not silent, but his messages can be safely ignored in this case - except one with zero length Vala file: Auriga ~/Desktop: rpmlint libtaginfo-* libtaginfo.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsi libtaginfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US taglib -> ta glib, ta-glib, tag lib libtaginfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vala -> lava, val, vale libtaginfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bitrate -> nitrate, bit rate, bit-rate libtaginfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US samplerate -> sample rate, sample-rate, sampler ate libtaginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsi libtaginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US taglib -> ta glib, ta-glib, tag lib libtaginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vala -> lava, val, vale libtaginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bitrate -> nitrate, bit rate, bit-rate libtaginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US samplerate -> sample rate, sample-rate, sampler ate ^^^ False positives. libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/info.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/waveinfo.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/speexinfo.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/apeinfo.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/mpcinfo.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/asfinfo.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/taginfo_internal.h libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/xiph_common.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/trueaudioinfo.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/ogginfo.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/bindings/c/taginfo_c.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/wavpackinfo.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/bindings/c/taginfo_c.h libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/flacinfo.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/mp3info.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/aiffinfo.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/taginfo.h libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/mp4info.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/mp4_common.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/id3_common.cc libtaginfo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libtaginfo-0.1.3/libtaginfo/ape_common.cc libtaginfo-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/libtaginfo/taginfo_internal.h libtaginfo-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/libtaginfo/taginfo_c.h ^^^ Not a blocker. Should be reported upstream. libtaginfo-devel.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/vala/vapi/libtaginfo_c.deps ^^^ That's something I'd like to be fixed/explained. libtaginfo-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/libtaginfo/taginfo.h ^^^ False positive. 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 25 errors, 10 warnings. Auriga ~/Desktop: + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (LGPLv2.1 or later). + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum libtaginfo-0.1.3.tar.gz* 33c42653c5302d0fb35c0b79dcd201263803b7d0750814cee9419e6eb8bc7d13 libtaginfo-0.1.3.tar.gz 33c42653c5302d0fb35c0b79dcd201263803b7d0750814cee9419e6eb8bc7d13 libtaginfo-0.1.3.tar.gz.1 sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See koji link above. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. + The package stores shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's default paths, and it calls ldconfig in %post and %postun. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. 0 The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. I personally don't like that it owns "/usr/share/vala/" and "/usr/share/vala/vapi/" but looks like a bunch of other packages are doing exactly the same. *Consider* splitting vala-related part to the *-vala subpackage and make it dependent on vala - that's *not* a blocker - just a friendly advice. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. 0 The package DOESN'T have a %clean section, so it won't build cleanly on systems with old rpm (EL-4 and EL-5). Beware. Also you should remove "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" from %install section - it also no longer required since EL6/F-12. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. +/- Header files are stored in a -devel package. I really surprized that one particular header was installed as %{_libdir}/libtaginfo/include/libtaginfoconfig.h. It's currently empty, so maybe it's better just to remove it - what do you think? 0 No static libraries. + The pkgconfig(.pc) files are stored in a -devel package. + The library file(s) that end in .so (without suffix) is(are) stored in a -devel package. + The -devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. +/- The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages, except Vala-related part. See my note below. I personally don't consider this as a blocker. 0 At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) although it's no longer necessary (see my note above). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. I don't see any *fatal* issues, except those who can be fixed right before importing to Fedora git repos, so this package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6YMNy7YCAN&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review