Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914752 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Only complaint from fedora-review is [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define. Note: %define libiscsi_includedir %{_includedir}/iscsi %define libiscsi_libdir %{_libdir}/iscsi The tools are GPLv2 licensed, not LGPLv2, this probably should be reflected in the .spec license field. Looks good for me apart from this. Package Review ============== Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. Note: Found : Packager: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> See: (this test has no URL) ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. Note: No (noreplace) in %config /etc/ld.so.conf.d/* [ ]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libiscsi- utils , libiscsi-devel [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Public domain", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/teuf/redhat/spice-xpi- rebased/914752-libiscsi/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 143360 bytes in 13 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define. Note: %define libiscsi_includedir %{_includedir}/iscsi %define libiscsi_libdir %{_libdir}/iscsi [ ]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: %clean present but not required [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [ ]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: libiscsi-1.7.0-2.fc18.x86_64.rpm libiscsi-utils-1.7.0-2.fc18.x86_64.rpm libiscsi-devel-1.7.0-2.fc18.x86_64.rpm libiscsi.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iSCSI -> SCSI, i SCSI, Isis libiscsi.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C iSCSI client library libiscsi.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iSCSI -> SCSI, i SCSI, Isis libiscsi.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libiscsi-x86_64.conf libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iSCSI -> SCSI, i SCSI, Isis libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C iSCSI Client Utilities libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iSCSI -> SCSI, i SCSI, Isis libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iscsi-readcapacity16 libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iscsi-inq libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iscsi-ls libiscsi-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iSCSI -> SCSI, i SCSI, Isis libiscsi-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C iSCSI client development libraries 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint libiscsi libiscsi-devel libiscsi-utils libiscsi.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iSCSI -> SCSI, i SCSI, Isis libiscsi.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C iSCSI client library libiscsi.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iSCSI -> SCSI, i SCSI, Isis libiscsi.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libiscsi-x86_64.conf libiscsi-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iSCSI -> SCSI, i SCSI, Isis libiscsi-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C iSCSI client development libraries libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iSCSI -> SCSI, i SCSI, Isis libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C iSCSI Client Utilities libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iSCSI -> SCSI, i SCSI, Isis libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iscsi-readcapacity16 libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iscsi-inq libiscsi-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iscsi-ls 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- libiscsi (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig config(libiscsi) libc.so.6()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) libiscsi-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config libiscsi libiscsi.so.1()(64bit) libiscsi-utils (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libiscsi.so.1()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0(LIBPOPT_0)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- libiscsi: config(libiscsi) libiscsi libiscsi(x86-64) libiscsi.so.1()(64bit) libiscsi-devel: libiscsi-devel libiscsi-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(libiscsi) libiscsi-utils: libiscsi-utils libiscsi-utils(x86-64) MD5-sum check ------------- https://github.com/downloads/sahlberg/libiscsi/libiscsi-1.7.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : caaaa8194e66f50a12e01ac44e0c9246f4eac388e2bebafbcd8efd2801ceacbf CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : caaaa8194e66f50a12e01ac44e0c9246f4eac388e2bebafbcd8efd2801ceacbf Generated by fedora-review 0.4.0 (660ce56) last change: 2013-01-29 Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 914752 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=usfSiJ26IY&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review