[Bug 904843] Review Request: acpica-tools - ACPICA tools for the development and debug of ACPI tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843

--- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> ---
> the other compiler option flags should be honoured 
>      (via %{optflags}) such as -g

Agreed. I had asked about filtering out -O2, since not all of %optflags
is about optimizing. Some help with locating bugs.


> [!]: Development files must be in a -devel package
> 
>      Note: should be automatically produced if -g option is used
>      during make

Could you elaborate? Perhaps you refer to the -debuginfo package?


> ExcludeArch should not be included ...

Either that or (as linked before) there must be tickets that
explain why ExcludeArch is used:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Support


> Package should obsolete pmtools - alternatives mechanism will
> only work if the other package is alternatives-aware

Since the plan was to add alternatives to pmtools, a ticket could be
opened for that, blocking this review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hcw6nwh37J&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]