[Bug 889011] Review Request: rubygem-asciidoctor - A pure Ruby implementation of AsciiDoc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889011

Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> We introduced a man page in 0.1.0, so I had to add an additional copy
> command to get it to work. If you have a cleaner way to do it, just let me
> know. Otherwise, it gets the job done.

I don't know any other better way. On the other hand, it'd be nice RFE for
RubyGems upstream 


* Add Requires: ruby(abi)
  - I asked you to remove "Requires: ruby". Unfortunately, you removed
ruby(abi)
    as well. However, this must stay.

This is the only issue I see with this package currently, so I conditionally
APPROVE the package.

However, please note that there are approved new Ruby packaging guidelines for
F19. According to them, you should replace the ruby(abi) with ruby(release) and
you should replace a "gem install" command by %gem_install macro. It would be
cool if you can update the package accordingly and build already in f19-ruby
targed, where the rebuild for Ruby 2.0.0 is ongoing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BDtKyWaddN&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]