[Bug 911188] Review Request: nodejs-should - A test framework agnostic BDD-style assertions for Node.js

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911188

--- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen <jamielinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
> I would argue that since should also provides access to this
> functionality in the form of a library, this a clear fork and
> okay for Fedora.

It's not really bundling as such, as it's really a forked library. So I don't
think opening a ticket in FPC's trac necessary.


https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Exceptions

> Are the changes useful to consumers other than the bundling
> application? If so why aren't we proposing that the library
> be released as a fork of the upstream library?

> is the package we're working on that bundles willing to make
> their fork a library that others can link against?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tHNf0IBtqB&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]