Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-27 08:43 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License is Distributable OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum OK - BuildRequires isn't required OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. + - rpmlint output: SRPM: E: hardcoded-library-path -> can be ignored RPM : E: hardcoded-library-path -> can be ignored OK - build in mock (FC-6 and FC-devel). OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review