Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 ------- Additional Comments From majain@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-27 08:14 EST ------- bitmap-fonts-0.3-5.1.2.fc7 has the following things fixed... (In reply to comment #1) > Random notes: > * rpmlint output: > W: bitmap-fonts invalid-license distributable > W: bitmap-fonts no-url-tag > W: bitmap-fonts-cjk invalid-license distributable > W: bitmap-fonts-cjk no-url-tag > W: bitmap-fonts-cjk no-documentation > > * It seems that the Lucida fonts are not free software. See the LU_LEGALNOTICE > in the package. > > * As this is actually three different set of fonts, the version (0.3) is quite > arbitrary. Also, at least ucs-fonts has released a newer version in 2006, while > the version in bitmap-fonts is from 2003. > > * Release is complicated (5.1.1) for no real reason. Should be changed to > integer value (6?). FIXXED > * BuildRoot should be changed to > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) FIXED > * In the "cjk" subpackage summary, CJK should be spelled with capital letters. FIXED > * "Prereq" should be replaced by "Requires" (see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#tags) FIXED Others - added the dist tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review