Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913152 --- Comment #10 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #9) > At this point, I'm blocked by my knowledges which are limited in this field. > You think I had to study for a long time how Makefile.inc are used during > compilation and probably it would have not been so difficult for an expert > programmer. I think you should focus first on getting the examples to show something more helpful :-) The error messages ERROR in MPI_ALLREDUCE, DATATYPE= 7 are not much encouraging. > About command line flags, I've not idea why he who has written the patches > then has arranged those flags in that way. :) Usually this is not much of an issue, and it it only a rpmlint warning. There is a small chance of problems if one intends to run debian binaries in fedora if changing the soname to match the package version, so, probably better to not let it be the cause of incompatibility. > How would you write that line ? I would experiment a bit, no ready response, but I would at first move the -Wl,-z,defs earlier in the command line, and ensure any -L and -l are before object file names, and also add -Wl,-as-needed. BTW, you should not hardcode CFLAGS in the SOURCEX Makefile.*, and instead patch them. Could add a regex pattern there like @@CFLAGS@@, and in the spec run sed -e 's|@@CFLAGS@@|%{optflags}|g' -i Makefile.* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=et5CwDqR56&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review