[Bug 908116] Review Request: openshift-origin-console - The OpenShift Management Console

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908116

--- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> ---
A few ( for now ) remarks :

- Provides:  openshift-origin-console = %{version} 

I think you mean :
Provides:  openshift-console = %{version} 

( as this would solve obsolete-not-provided and useless-provides, because
providing the package name is likely not what you want )

- why does it need gcc-c++ at run time ? does it compile something ?

- conffile-without-noreplace-flag mean that if someone modify them, then they
will be replaced on upgrade. So that's not really what we want from a
configuration file. So either they are configuration and i can modify them, or
they are not. 

- W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
# don't know where it's seeing a binary

the message is "only non binary", so indeed, it doesn't see a binary there :)
FHS would mandate to put in /usr/share but if that's ruby module, it can go to
/usr/lib

- I see the console is running under the uid of apache, so you need
/var/www/.openshift/api.yml. However, having a config file outside of /etc, in
a hidden directory, is pretty bad. The config file is not marked as such, so if
I install the console somewhere, change the location of the broker and upgrade,
my modification will be removed. That's a pretty serious problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IQMChpnWfA&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]