[Bug 910537] Review Request: palapeli - A jigsaw puzzle game

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910537

nucleo <alekcejk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from nucleo <alekcejk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
MUST Items:
+ rpmlint output
  $ rpmlint palapeli-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm
palapeli-libs-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm palapeli-devel-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm
palapeli-debuginfo-4.10.0-2.fc18.i686.rpm palapeli-4.10.0-4.fc18.src.rpm
palapeli.spec 
    palapeli.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary palapeli
    palapeli-libs.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Runtime -> Run time,
Run-time, Rudiment
    palapeli-libs.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Runtime -> Run
time, Run-time, Rudiment
    palapeli-libs.i686: W: no-documentation
    palapeli-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
+ named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
  Package name match the upstream tarball name palapeli-4.10.0.tar.xz
+ spec file name palapeli.spec matches base package name
+ complies with all the legal guidelines:
  + License: GPLv2+ and GFDL, LGPLv2+ for palapeli-lib matches actual license
  + No known patent problems
  + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components
+ COPYING (GPLv2), COPYING.DOC (GFDL) amd COPYING.LIB (LGPLv2+) packaged as
%doc
+ source matches upstream:
  MD5: 5f8b63dbf65c8303e77af396337ec320  palapeli-4.10.0.tar.xz
  SHA1: da5a7b197e6a641c4882d15e85923303e2646567  palapeli-4.10.0.tar.xz
  SHA256: abcb14d992a864b696bc652171069eecd469922fd724e30c5821c77ae41ae00e 
palapeli-4.10.0.tar.xz
+ builds on at least one arch
  build from mock is in F18 kde-unstable repo
+ no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed
+ no missing BuildRequires (builds in mock)
+ locales are handled properly by using %find_lang %{name} --with-kde macro
+ ldconfig call used in palapeli-libs %post and %postun 
+ no duplicated system libraries
+ package not relocatable (no Prefix tag)
+ directory ownership correct (doesn't own directories owned by another
package, owns all package-specific directories %{_kde4_appsdir}/%{name}/,
%{_kde4_includedir}/libpala/, %{_kde4_libdir}/libpala/,
%{_kde4_includedir}/Pala/)
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ permissions correct, %defattr(-,root,root,-) not needed now, executables have
executable permissions
+ macros used where possible (%{name}, %{version}, %{buildroot},
%{_target_platform}, %{cmake_kde4}, %{_kde4_datadir}, %{_kde4_bindir},
%{_kde4_iconsdir},%{_kde4_appsdir},%{_kde4_configdir}, %{_kde4_libdir},
%{_kde4_includedir})
+ non-code content: only permitted content, images under license that matches
the code
+ no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed
+ no %doc files required at runtime
+ header files packaged in palapeli-devel
+ no static libraries, so no -static package needed
+ devel symlink packaged in palapeli-devel
+ palapeli-devel package must require the base package palapeli-libs
+ no .la files
+ palapeli.desktop file for the GUI app palapeli present
+ desktop-file-validate is used in %check and the palapeli.desktop file passes
validation
+ all filenames are valid UTF-8
+ other packaging guidelines:
  + complies with the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (all files in 
%{_kde4_datadir}, %{_kde4_bindir},
%{_kde4_iconsdir},%{_kde4_appsdir},%{_kde4_configdir}, %{_kde4_libdir},
%{_kde4_includedir})
  + proper changelog, tags, BuildRequires, Summary, Description (got from
palapeli's documentation)
  + no non-UTF-8 characters
  + all relevant documentation included as %doc (COPYING, COPYING.DOC,
COPYING.LIB)
  + RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used in %{cmake_kde4} macro
  + palapeli-debuginfo package is valid (contains stripped symbols from ELF
binary and source code related to it)
  + no rpaths (no check-rpaths error)
  + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply
  + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply
  + timestamps are preserved
  + %{?_smp_mflags} used
  + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply
  + no conflicts (kdegames-4.10.0 is metapackage now which not includes apps)

SHOULD Items:
+ license already included upstream
+ no translations for description and summary provided by upstream
+ package builds in mock (built for kde-unstable)
- successfully tested the package functionality (no testing yet)
+ scriptlets are sane (updating hicolor icon chache in %post, %postun,
%posttrans, updating mime and desktop database)
+ subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully
versioned dependency (palapeli-libs can be installed without palapeli)
+ no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant
+ no file dependencies
- package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts

APPROVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yJt3tMDO91&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]