Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab - Yet Another Part-of-Speech and Morphological Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229927 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-26 11:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > looks fine, but what about all my other remarks? Just I didn't look them... Well, your suggestion seems preferable. However I am always annoyed when I review packages * main package requires some data * and the data is provided by several package and only one is required and the views are different between the packages... http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/mecab.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/mecab-0.94-0.3.pre2.fc6_LC.src.rpm (for now also write jumandic here) http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/mecab-jumandic.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/mecab-jumandic-5.1.20051121-2.fc6_LC.src.rpm * Tue Feb 27 2007 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.94-0.3.pre2 - Package requirement deps reconstruct * Tue Feb 27 2007 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 5.1.20051121-2 - Package requirement deps reconstruct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review